DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eisman, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eisman, J. A.

Vol. 29, Issue 4, 505-512, April 2001

Pharmacogenetics of the Vitamin D Receptor and Osteoporosis

John A. Eisman

Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Osteoporosis is a major health care problem internationally with important implications for health care costs, morbidity, and mortality. Bone density, an important predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk, is affected by hormonal and environmental factors. However, in twin and family studies most of its age-specific variance is genetically determined. Common allelic variations in the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene were the first to be linked to bone density. Recently, other candidate genes, notably oestrogen receptor, collagen 1alpha I, and PTH receptor genes and a chromosome 11 locus, have been associated with bone density and fracture. Polymorphisms in adjacent regulatory regions may be important mechanisms since functional coding region mutations have not been defined. For example, the polymorphic region in the collagen 1alpha I gene alters a SpI binding site and may alter collagen gene expression. At the pharmacogenetic level, VDR alleles predict differences in gut calcium absorption and long-term bone density response to calcium intake and active vitamin D analog treatment. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these allelic differences in relation to diet and lifestyle factors as well as response to therapy could aid selection of optimal therapy for osteoporosis prevention and treatment.


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
J. C. C. Rocha, C. Cheng, W. Liu, S. Kishi, S. Das, E. H. Cook, J. T. Sandlund, J. Rubnitz, R. Ribeiro, D. Campana, et al.
Pharmacogenetics of outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood, June 15, 2005; 105(12): 4752 - 4758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. V. Relling, W. Yang, S. Das, E. H. Cook, G. L. Rosner, M. Neel, S. Howard, R. Ribeiro, J. T. Sandlund, C.-H. Pui, et al.
Pharmacogenetic Risk Factors for Osteonecrosis of the Hip Among Children With Leukemia
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2004; 22(19): 3930 - 3936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.