DMD

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dingemanse, J.
Right arrow Articles by van Giersbergen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dingemanse, J.
Right arrow Articles by van Giersbergen, P.

Vol. 28, Issue 12, 1411-1416, December 2000

Comparative Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of a Metabolite of a Quinolizinone Hypnotic and Zolpidem in Healthy Subjects

Jasper Dingemanse, Michele Bury, Yasmin Hussain, and Paul van Giersbergen

Jacor Research, Bottmingen, Switzerland (J.D., P.v.G); and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland (M.B., Y.H.)

The objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study were to assess the single dose tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of Ro 41-3290 (5, 10, and 30 mg) and zolpidem (10 mg) in three sequential groups of 10 healthy male subjects. Pharmacodynamic (tracking, attention, and memory test) and pharmacokinetic measurements were conducted over a period of 24 and 50 h, respectively, after drug intake. Ro 41-3290 was well tolerated at all doses as was zolpidem. Performance in both a tracking and a memory search test was affected at 1.5 h after administration of zolpidem, whereas effects had vanished by 8 h. Ro 41-3290 induced moderate, dose-independent effects, which were most pronounced at 4 h after intake. Long-term memory, as assessed by a word learning and recall test, was not clearly affected by any drug. The pharmacokinetics of Ro 41-3290 were dose proportional with an elimination half-life of approximately 8 h. The relatively slow absorption of Ro 41-3290 (tmax approximately 2.5 h) and the concentration-effect time delay do not make it a good candidate to replace its parent compound Ro 41-3696 as an investigational hypnotic.


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.