![]() |
|
|
Vol. 27, Issue 1, 113-121, January 1999
)-6-Aminocarbovir in Rats. I. Prodrug Activation May Be Limited by Access to Enzyme
Departments of Pharmaceutics and Medicinal Chemistry, University of
Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Several in vitro and in situ approaches were used to determine
the dominant presystemic activation site for (
)-6-aminocarbovir, (
)-carbocyclic
2',3'-didehydro-2',3'-dideoxy-6-deoxy-6-aminoguanosine (6AC) conversion in rats. The in vitro disappearance half-lives (mean ± S.D.) in the cytosolic fractions obtained from
homogenates of the intestine, liver, and intestinal contents were
0.4 ± 0.1 (n = 3), 12.2 ± 1.1 (n = 3), and 15.5 (n = 1) min,
respectively. An in situ vascularly perfused intestine-liver (IPIL)
study was then carried out (n = 6) to determine the
relative contribution of each presystemic organ to the overall
first-pass extraction of 6AC. The 6AC extraction ratios in the
intestine and liver in the IPIL were found to be 0.08 ± 0.02 and
0.11 ± 0.03, respectively. The intestinal extraction ratio was in
dramatic contrast to the in vitro results. It was postulated that
vascularly delivered 6AC had limited access to the metabolic site in
the intestine. A theoretical analysis suggested that the extent of
intestinal wall extraction of 6AC would be underestimated by the IPIL
and should be determined after oral dosing. To compare intestinal extraction ratio in the IPIL with that after an oral administration, in
situ intestinal lumen perfusions (n = 4) and
intraportal infusions (n = 3) of 6AC were conducted in
two groups of rats. The lumenally administered 6AC was extracted to a
much greater extent by the intestine as compared with the IPIL, which
presents 6AC to the intestine by the vascular route. The extraction
ratio was found to be 0.54 ± 0.06, which was significantly larger
than that obtained in the IPIL.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. S. Pang MODELING OF INTESTINAL DRUG ABSORPTION: ROLES OF TRANSPORTERS AND METABOLIC ENZYMES (FOR THE GILLETTE REVIEW SERIES) Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 2003; 31(12): 1507 - 1519. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Tam, R. G. Tirona, and K. S. Pang Segmental Intestinal Transporters and Metabolic Enzymes on Intestinal Drug Absorption Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 373 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Kothare and C. L. Zimmerman Intestinal Metabolism: The Role of Enzyme Localization in Phenol Metabolite Kinetics Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2002; 30(5): 586 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Zimmerman, Y. Wen, and R. P. Remmel First-Pass Disposition of (-)-6-Aminocarbovir in Rats: II. Inhibition of Intestinal First-Pass Metabolism Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2000; 28(6): 672 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cong, M. Doherty, and K. S. Pang A New Physiologically Based, Segregated-Flow Model to Explain Route-Dependent Intestinal Metabolism Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2000; 28(2): 224 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||