DMD Celsis microsomes mean better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by du Souich, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marier, J.-F.
Right arrow Articles by du Souich, P.

Vol. 26, Issue 2, 164-169, February 1998

Stereoselective Disposition of Propranolol in Rabbits
Role of Presystemic Organs and Dose

Jean-François Marier, Vincent Pichette,1 and Patrick du Souich

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal

The kinetics of propranolol enantiomers are stereoselective when high doses of the racemic drug are given po. To document whether the dose and/or the route of administration determines the stereoselective kinetics of propranolol enantiomers, conscious rabbits received 40, 80, or 120 mg/kg po or 0.5 or 10 mg/kg iv doses of racemic propranolol, and serial blood samples were obtained to assay propranolol enantiomers. At low po and iv doses, the kinetics of the propranolol enantiomers were identical. After the 120 mg/kg po dose, the kinetics of the enantiomers were stereoselective, i.e. the AUC0right-arrow infinity for (S)-(-)-propranolol was greater than the AUC0right-arrow infinity for (R)-(+)-propranolol (p < 0.05). The iv injection of 10 mg/kg generated zero-order kinetics, and (S)-(-)-propranolol was eliminated faster than the antipode. Propranolol enantiomer plasma protein binding was not stereoselective. In vitro, after the incubation of 5.8 or 58 µM (RS)-propranolol with cells of the intestinal mucosa or the liver, (R)-(+)-propranolol was more rapidly metabolized than (S)-(-)-propranolol at both concentrations in the intestine and at the higher concentration in the liver. Incubation of the individual enantiomers (2.9 and 29 µM) showed that in the intestine the intrinsic clearance of (R)-(+)-propranolol was greater than that of (S)-(-)-propranolol but in the liver there was preferential saturation of (S)-(-)-propranolol clearance. In conclusion, at low po or iv doses the kinetics of (RS)-propranolol are not stereoselective because the liver overshadows the effect of the intestine, and at high po doses the kinetics of propranolol enantiomers are stereoselective because of hepatic saturation of (S)-(-)-propranolol clearance.


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Y. Hung, G. A. Siebert, P. Chang, Y. G. Anissimov, and M. S. Roberts
Disposition Kinetics of Propranolol Isomers in the Perfused Rat Liver
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2004; 311(2): 822 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.